FloridaStreetScene

Go Back   FloridaStreetScene > Community Forums > General Automotive Discusions

Notices

General Automotive Discusions Discuss your problems, solutions or any other automotive topic, give and get technical help here also. Import or Domestic, it doesn't matter.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-26-2009, 12:27 AM   #1
2ToneKia
Under my car!
 
2ToneKia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Davie, FL
Age: 39
Posts: 692
2ToneKia has much to be proud of, 50-99
Default For those that use Royal Purple oil..

here is the link:

http://www.imakenews.com/lng/e_artic....cfm?x=b11,0,w



Truth in Advertising: BP v. Royal Purple

By George Gill

Royal Purple Ltd. was black and blue after BP Lubricants USA took it to task over advertising claims for its synthetic motor oil, finding a receptive audience in the advertising industry’s self-regulatory forum.

The National Advertising Division of the Council of Better Business Bureaus recommended Porter, Texas-based Royal Purple modify or discontinue numerous advertising claims for its synthetic motor oil, following a challenge by Wayne, N.J.-based BP Lubricants. The NAD examined comparative performance and superiority claims in print, broadcast and Internet advertising. In some of the advertising, Royal Purple compared its performance to Castrol, Shell, Amsoil and other motor oil brands.

NAD recommended that Royal Purple discontinue its use of consumer testimonials reporting specific performance attributes in the absence of reliable independent evidence showing performance capability.

“Anecdotal evidence based solely on the experiences of individual consumers is insufficient to support product efficacy claims, including claims related to horsepower, torque, fuel economy or engine heat,” the organization stated. “While the advertiser may quote from published articles if it provides clear and conspicuous attribution to the publisher, it may not rely on such articles to support efficacy claims for which it has no reliable independent validation.”

NAD recommended Royal Purple discontinue claims such as “Increases horsepower and torque by as much as 3 percent,” “Reduces Engine Wear by 80 percent,” “Superior Oxidation Stability” and “Provides Film Strength Up to 400 Percent.”

“If industry-standard tests or tests with carefully documented controls were abandoned, there would be no basis whatsoever for making any meaningful claims about the relative efficacy of motor oils,” BP said in its challenge.

NAD recommended that Royal Purple discontinue claims that stated, “Improves fuel economy by as much as 5 percent” and “Fuel economy improvement up to 5 percent or more” because its Environmental Protection Agency testing was inconclusive and the “Oklahoma State Study” and single cylinder Labeco CLR diesel engine testing cited in Royal Purple’s advertising was not relevant. The NAD noted the 1997 OSU Study was “outdated and nothing in the record demonstrated that the formulations of the competitors’ oils were similar to those available for sale on the market today.”

BP Lubricants said it hired the independent laboratory Southwest Research Institute, in San Antonio, to analyze power output of gasoline engines with Royal Purple Oil and with BP’s Castrol oil for comparisons. “The results were provided to the challenger’s expert statistician who was not informed of the identity of the candidate oils,” NAD stated. “The challenger’s [BP’s] expert determined a 0.9 percent difference in power between the oils, which did not rise to the level of statistical significance, and is well below the 3 percent claim made by the advertiser.”

SwRI did additional tests to independently determine the differences in fuel economy, emissions data and engine temperature between Royal Purple and Castrol motor oils. According to SwRI, “there was no statistically significant difference between the fuel economy, emissions data or engine temperature between the two candidate oils,” NAD said.

Following its review of the non-anecdotal evidence in the record, NAD recommended that Royal Purple discontinue the claims, “Reduces emissions up to 20 percent or more” and “Reductions in emissions of 20 percent or more” because the studies on which the claims were based were outdated and not consumer-relevant.

NAD also recommended the advertiser discontinue its unsupported claim that Royal purple motor oil is “API/ILSAC Certified.” Noting that API and ILSAC licenses and certifications have many categories with different meanings, the NAD recommended that the company discontinue its claim that its synthetic oils are “generally ‘API/ILSAC Certified.’”

In fact, no Royal Purple products are certified to current ILSAC specifications.

The American Petroleum Institute licenses its trademarked Service Symbol, or ‘donut,’ for display on qualified engine oils, and also licenses the ILSAC ‘starburst’ logo for oils that meet the auto industry’s latest energy-conserving standards. In API’s online directory of licensees for its Engine Oil Licensing and Certification Program, Royal Purple has a total of 23 passenger car and diesel engine oil products listed, all licensed to use the API donut. Five of these may additionally display the words ‘energy conserving’ within the donut logo, but none of the Royal Purple products are licensable to the current ILSAC GF-4 specification and they cannot display the starburst logo.

Royal Purple also voluntarily agreed to discontinue the claims, “most advanced,” “unsurpassed performance” and “unparalleled performance,” steps the NAD said were necessary and proper to avoid confusion in the marketplace.

“While Royal Purple also believes that the tests and testimonials it supplied as evidence accurately portray the benefits of using its synthetic oil in a wide variety of applications, it defers to the NAD’s position that those tests and testimonials alone are insufficient to support specific performance attribute claims in consumer advertising,” the company said in its response to NAD. “... [Royal Purple] has already made changes to its advertising in accordance with the NAD recommendations and will continue to implement NAD’s recommendations and analysis in developing Royal Purple’s future advertising.”

BP Lubricants did not return phone calls from Lube Report requesting comment on NAD’s decision.
__________________
2ToneKia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2009, 12:31 AM   #2
omorales
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 12,682
omorales has a brilliant future 100-124omorales has a brilliant future 100-124
Default

Lightly read it over cuz it was long as hell lol. All I can say is I've used it a couple of times and its not too bad. But mobil 1 ftmfw.
omorales is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2009, 12:32 AM   #3
jdm87d16a1
teef snitch
 
jdm87d16a1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: 15024 sw 139 place
Age: 30
Posts: 4,352
jdm87d16a1 has a brilliant future 100-124jdm87d16a1 has a brilliant future 100-124
Default

oem oils ftmfw
__________________
WILL ROCK SHOP STICKERS IN EXCHANGE FOR FREE PARTS!!!!
jdm87d16a1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2009, 12:33 AM   #4
omorales
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 12,682
omorales has a brilliant future 100-124omorales has a brilliant future 100-124
Default

Fuck^
omorales is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2009, 01:19 AM   #5
SS Z31
Dastun Z
 
SS Z31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Fl, Miami
Posts: 3,548
SS Z31 has a brilliant future 100-124SS Z31 has a brilliant future 100-124
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jdm87d16a1 View Post
oem oils ftmfw
thats why shit breaks on hondas because you don't switch to synthetic.

fuck oem oil

even race engines use synthetic. synthetic of lyfe!
__________________
=[
SS Z31 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2009, 01:34 AM   #6
omorales
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 12,682
omorales has a brilliant future 100-124omorales has a brilliant future 100-124
Default

Fuck^ that post has no logic at all.
omorales is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2009, 01:35 AM   #7
Parked240
Mod Status
 
Parked240's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Age: 29
Posts: 11,434
Parked240 Has succeeded in this life (125-149)Parked240 Has succeeded in this life (125-149)
Default

Cliffs?
__________________
Myth Crew + Team Drunk > *

Quote:
Originally Posted by omorales View Post
fo' do's mo' RAEP
Parked240 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2009, 01:38 AM   #8
omorales
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 12,682
omorales has a brilliant future 100-124omorales has a brilliant future 100-124
Default

royal purple doesn't do all the shit they claim, like a 3 hp increase and fuel economy increase so they did research, proved it, and asked those fgts to stop claiming shit that's not true, much like george building his motor.
omorales is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2009, 01:41 AM   #9
Parked240
Mod Status
 
Parked240's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Age: 29
Posts: 11,434
Parked240 Has succeeded in this life (125-149)Parked240 Has succeeded in this life (125-149)
Default

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOFFFFFFFFFFFFF
Never bought that shit anyways. Seemed over priced
__________________
Myth Crew + Team Drunk > *

Quote:
Originally Posted by omorales View Post
fo' do's mo' RAEP
Parked240 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2009, 01:43 AM   #10
SS Z31
Dastun Z
 
SS Z31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Fl, Miami
Posts: 3,548
SS Z31 has a brilliant future 100-124SS Z31 has a brilliant future 100-124
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by omorales View Post
Fuck^ that post has no logic at all.
read syth FTW

dino FTL

http://www.club-s12.org/forums/index...dpost&p=224569
__________________
=[
SS Z31 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
royal purple - purple ice (super coolant) SS Z31 General Automotive Discusions 11 04-04-2010 10:53 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
The forum is protected by expressed copyright and the information contained within this forum is intended for its members to be used here and is privileged to the valued users of this forum. You are notified that any use, dissemination, or coping of the information here is not permitted without the permission of the administration.